The concept of ‘cis’ privilege falsely situates gender-conforming men and women as equals, relative to self-identified trans people. This is problematic for radical feminists because trans politics prioritises the oppression of gender non-conformity through trans as the primary source of gender oppression. Conversely, feminists prioritise women’s oppression as the primary axis of gender-based oppression (ie. gay men being in danger because they could be perceived as women-like). Certainly, gender non-conformity is dangerous for everyone—trans identified or not (ie. butch lesbians). But gender-conformity is dangerous to women in ways that it is not dangerous to men, according to the radical feminists: women are targeted as women regardless of whether they gender conform or not while men are never targeted as men. Men are only targeted when they are gender non-conforming.

Julian Vigo, Gaslighting in the Age of ‘Misgendering’

Such a beautiful, lucid, and concise refutation of cis privilege. Love it!

Notes

  1. radfemresource reblogged this from nextyearsgirlisaghostnow
  2. arutemawepon reblogged this from snowflakeespecial
  3. grrrlgrrrl reblogged this from evilfeminist
  4. weloveradfems reblogged this from turning0nthelatheofheaven
  5. thespinsterette reblogged this from evilfeminist
  6. tappedout reblogged this from radsadnspooky
  7. witchyglitchy reblogged this from snowflakeespecial
  8. lineageofwhimsy reblogged this from anachronisticsiren
  9. anachronisticsiren reblogged this from purrbox
  10. harpieswithhandgrenades reblogged this from nextyearsgirlisaghostnow
  11. ilungas reblogged this from whattheworldisreallylike
  12. counter-balance reblogged this from snowflakeespecial
  13. whattheworldisreallylike reblogged this from rachelevation76
  14. state-ofwonder reblogged this from the-identity-police
  15. ravefromthegrave reblogged this from never-obey